Climate removed From EPA Website, choosing not to renew nine board members’ terms. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/08/epa-board-scienti…

show more
Upvotes (5)
Comments (4)
Sorted by:
  • ClimatePonziLie reply The Carbon TAX PONZI SCHEME is part of making coal and other forms of energy more expensive so they can claim that alternatives are less expensive, when most of the cost with all fuels are TAXED to fund their war on these same fuels that built and support our cities. They want to force carbon capture for NO other reason but to make the cost of coal and other fuels more expensive and to perpetuate the dogma that there taking steps for our good. It all part of the PONZI SCHEME to try and convince the public that their getting value for the money being stolen from us by them. They put up a good front with big Wind mills and fake benefits of their solar panel displays.
  • ClimatePonziLie reply Why did they build the dams in California in the first place because there were droughts. This last drought lasted long enough that they needed to restrict water use they should have taken the opportunity to increase their ability to hold more water. But they didn't and now that it has rained the opportunity has been lost. There were many large floods in California in the past. The Great Flood of 1862 was the largest flood in the recorded history of Oregon, Nevada, and California, occurring from December 1861 to January 1862. The Globalist will try to turn this into an opportunity to push their PONZI Scheme of Climate Change. Remember there dams are huge they were sized a hundred years ago, knowing that there are these variations in the weather. The dust bowl of the 30's lasted 10 years. This was before the height of the industrial revolution that man was to have cause the Climate Change nonsense.
  • ClimatePonziLie reply The earth temperatures were several degrees {WARMER} in the Medieval period. They weren't fighting to get food and still have energy to build the grand cathedrals of Europe. There was plenty of food because the climate permitted them extra food production. Many of the Roman sea ports are still in the same locations. So the ocean didn't displace them from the evidence. Imperial Rome's Great Ancient Seaport City, Both WW1 and WW2 were before the big industrial revolution and the world was in a {cold} period and the Global CO2 was at an all time low. Below 150 ppm, plant-life dies off on a massive scale - See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2013/05/17/atmospheric-co2-concentrations-at-400-ppm-are-still-dangerously-low-for-life-on-earth/#sthash.apyxCIsM.dpuf Just 30 less ppm of CO2 and the Earth would have been dead. Yes that is the cutoff point around 280 ppm of CO2 and plants die. The Middle Ages or Medieval Period lasted from the 5th to the 15th century. The Dust Bowl of the 1930s, so...moremetimes referred to as the "Dirty Thirties” lasted about a decade. They didn't have significant accumulations of rain and the earth was much {COOLER}. The Graphs that the IPPC are manipulated to start in the {cold) and leave out the previous {warm} Medieval era, the truth is the earth is still in a {Cold} era it just not as cold as it could be, CO2 in the air only serves to take money out of your pocket and into the pockets of the Globalist.
  • Blue_Rayner reply Scott Pruitt, the EPA administrator, has chosen not to renew the terms of nine of the 18-member board of scientific counsellors, which advises the EPA on the quality and accuracy of the science it produces. The group, largely made up of academics, is set to be replaced by representatives from industries that the EPA regulates. Deborah Swackhamer, chair of the board, said that with other planned departures, the panel was left with five members, including her, in the midst of an EPA hiring freeze. “The committee has been eviscerated,” she told the Guardian. “We assumed these people would be renewed and there was no reason or indication they wouldn’t be. These people aren’t Obama appointees, they are scientific appointees. To have a political decision to get rid of them was a shock.” The nine departing members – who worked on matters including toxic water pollution, climate change and chemical safety – all completed three-year terms. The decision to not renew those term...mores has opened the way for the Trump administration to refashion the scientific board in line with its industry-friendly agenda that has sought to strip away various pollution rules in the name of “regulatory certainty”.
Download the Vidme app!