As a wise you-tuber once said “no movie is without sin”. Nor is an Episode of doctor who. We continue with the fourth episode of the modern era (“nuwho”) series 27, episode 4 “aliens of london”, part one of the first 2 parter of modern who
the mentioned theory on the doctors age can be found here
All material shown belongs to the BBC. I claim no ownership of any clips used
Even the “sins” idea isn’t mine, this is inspired by “cinemasins” also inspired by “pokesins” by Gar1onriva and “EWW pokemon movies” by SkulShurtugalTCG, who were inspired by “cinemasins”
as another point, I LOVE Dr who, it is my favourite show of all time, and this is a tribute to it. I am ripping and being nit-picky and so on out of love, not hate.
rules for a sin.
New who has separate rules to classic, unless specifically referring to a specific character, E.G. the doctor. But things like species capabilities and such are different sets of rules/
Unless it is a “mystery”, it is sinnable if it is not explained in or before that episode
A sin is when they change something. So for example, angels in “blink” aren’t sinned for not being able to move whilst looking at each other. BUT later angels are sinned for moving whilst looking at each other, as blink came first and there is no reason the rule does not apply to them.
Extended universe doesn’t count. Show or it didn’t happen
if a mistake is intentional, it isn’t a sin (e.g., end of the worlds “I-pod”)
there is a bonus round, where up to 3 sins can be added or removed for something notable in the big picture, or especially superb or especially awful.