Willie Soon - Could it be The Sun?

Anons Follow
  • 11
  • 1
show more
Upvotes (3)
Comments (4)
Sorted by:
  • ClimatePonziLie reply The power to charge your car, comes from the coal power plant. The 34 kWh to travel 100 miles which is a sales pitch. What is 34,000 Watts, a Microwave is 1400 Watts. 34/ 1.4 = 23 Microwave oven running in your home and the neighbors home, think of it every home across the city using the equivalence of 23 microwaves to recharge there car every night. The result is there will be a boom in power plant construction. Lets not forget the transmission system that would have to be increase five fold to handle all the additional capacity. What happen if the power goes out you won't be able to charge your car now the storm has you trapped. When 30 Million people were stranded when the power went out, or 700 Million in India. When everyone starts using power to charge their cars. The electrical system will collapse fast and the cost of rebuilding will ( Drive , LOL) your power cost for everything that you currently do through the roof, to say this is unexpected or is it a planned consequence. Wi...morend is unpredictable and Solar is a fake solution.
  • ClimatePonziLie reply Areal Density of solar energy measured in Watts/ SQ meter. Would that be on a roof that can adjust to the right azimuth angle every day of the year and tracks the sun all day long. Some sites give the amounts between 150 to 200 Watts / SQ meter. To power a 1500W Microwave oven in peak sunlight would require 10 SQ meters. There is talk of power storage with batteries are not 100% efficient and they need to be kept heated, vented and Replaced and disposed of safely. If you want to go Solar you will need to store a minimum of 2/3 of the energy produced in the day to power the night. Every time a power source needs to rely on the coal power then it is increasing the cost of the coal power as it is increasing the total cost of the electrical system for everyone. The best current solar power could do is reduce current peak power demand, too bad that doesn't occur in the middle of the day when the sun is at it's highest.
  • ClimatePonziLie reply Change. I will try to explain the problem with wind generation with a analogy. A farmer has 100 cows that each require 1 gallon of water every day. The farmer decides a windmill can pump the water. He installs a Windmill that can pump 100 Gallons of water. The next day there isn't any wind. The Farmer decides that he can fix the problem by installing another windmill, Now he will have one to pump the water and the other to charge some batteries for when there is no wind. This worked until the wind stopped for 2 days, After the first day without wind the power in the batteries was used up. So he decided that he needed to install a Third Windmill to store more energy and he would also have to increase his battery storage capacity. Finally he looked at his bills and realized he would have been better off just buying a gas powered pump. Even after installing a Third Windmill he still doesn't have energy reliability. Wind and Solar can't provide a guaranteed energy supply, This fact makes...more solar and wind a redundancy of the reliably of coal as our primary energy source. Every time these alternative sources fail we then need to draw form the secure power source, which is this is disruptive to planning and costing out a reliable energy system. These intermittent energy sources actually don't provide reliability, and they should pay a penalty to that provider that is in the background to take on their lack of production to offset his expenders for their causing the system to became more erratic in it's energy out put. This is the problem with wind it is redundant of the secure source of energy as you can't predict when there will and won't be power.
  • ClimatePonziLie reply There trying to promote their fake Global Warming, They are trying to promote unreliable Energy that needs to be extremely oversized and is expensive so they can collect even more money form the public. Government policy is intentionally increasing the cost of coal fired power by putting unnecessary regulations and TAXES on them as part of their Ponzi Scheme to collect Carbon TAXES . They are pushing Carbon Capture which in unnecessary but they have tried to promote the idea that CO2 is pollution which it is not. The CO2 is useful and could be used to grow vegetables in green houses in colder climates. The excess heat could be used to heat the Green house and water for fish farms. This would create thousands of jobs and make use of the products of power generation and bring the cost of food down as a result. Instead they push the carbon under the ground and increase the cost of power, all to keep this fake Global Warming Ponzi Scheme going. It's time the people wake up and see this as ...moreanother attempt to steal money from our pockets.
Load more comments
Download the Vidme app!