Published on Aug 24, 2017
Here I read just the beginning of a much longer article:
Antifa DONE After Their Dark Secret Comes Out In Training Manual A Rioter Accidentally Dropped
By Prissy Holly, at:
Then, I comment on the Aug. 19th "Misled Peoples Rally" which is the subject of ten previous videos. There I was abused by antifa one boy tried to grab my Adolf Hitler pin.
Later, I receied this email from Dick Eastman
Sent: Aug 27, 2017 10:45 AM
Subject: Who made the Antifa "manual" Re: THE PROTOCOLS OF ANTIFA What would an Antifa or BLM agitator's field manual look like? A serious and very helpful satire.
Who made the Antifa manual? Isn't it obvious?
The "manual" is not real, but it is a very close approximation of Antifa practice. The photographs are not real. The "documemnt" is supposed to be on both sides of the page, but the same wrinkle is always on the right page after page (if a document is printed on two sides than a wrinkle seen on one side would be on the other side in the next photo copied page -- they failed to do that here. Also the very faint print that is supposed to be the printing on the back of the page leaf is not backwards but forward. CAN IT BE THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR TACTICS FROM BECOMING KNOW AND RECOGNIZED THEY HAVE DELIBERATELY PLACED THE TRUTH ON A FALSE-NEWS SITE WITH AN IMPOSSIBLE STORY OF THE DOCUMENT BEING FOUND ON "A COLLEGE CAMPUS" -- NONE OF WHICH RINGS TRUE BECAUSE IT LACKS ANY VERIFIABLE DETAIL. By doing this they cover the truth about their methods by giving it a reputation as false-news and anyone explaining how they operate from observation and study can be discredited because what they say is what appeared in false news. I am sure that is what is happening here. That is what false-news does. They can't deny the truth but they can destroy its reputation by bad association, by making it come from crackpots which they have created to be …