Fib: an unimportant lie, if Photoshop weren't used. Decide for yourself. I still don't think the parts were planted, even if they were never shown in a museum. That’s probably because the official photo was staged and manipulated to depict one piece instead of two… likely by an egotistical, megalomaniacal Gene Corley, FEMA lead investigator. Sources, article: https://911conspiracy.wordpress.com/2017/06/24/femas-fuselage-fib/
My website: http://www.911conspiracy.tv
Note on the amateur pilots accuracy: WTC 1 was hit less than a meter from dead center. http://the911forum.freeforums.org/flight-11-impact-orientation-and-precision-t210.html
WTC 2 was hit on the right side at floor 81, perhaps the most flammable of all points in the tower because it housed UPS battery stacks.
For those who think no plane hit the Pentagon despite the lamp post damage, plane parts and passenger DNA, consider that the plane crashed into the one section of the Pentagon that had just been renovated to withstand a terrorist attack... which explains the lack of damage and the huge descending spiral turn of the flight path. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buUYKj5Rmsg
Shanksville is the exception, because the first 3 planes hit their targets. Still they ID'd the passengers and recovered heaps of plane parts. http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/5660263/1/#new
Thanks, MrKoenig1985 for pointing out the NOVA documentary showing Gene holding a Nikon camera, not a Canon as the questionable photograph's EXIF data lists. This adds a wrinkle to the conspiracy. Your channel is brilliant:
We look forward to hearing from David Cole's recent attempts at FOIA requests to resolve this matter with more than our total of 5 image sources.
Thanks to those who commented on my bad audio. I attempted a fix and re-uploaded with that adjustment and the addition of MrKoenig1985's screencaps of…